Register for the next Introducing FOSS4Lib Webinar on July 27th

Welcome to the FOSS4LIB site

'When the Open Source System is the Best System' Open Source Integrated Library System in a Rural American Library Kuali OLE at the University of Chicago Library

Now available! Three case studies of organizations adopting open source software: "When the Open Source System is the Best System" implementing CORAL, "Open Source Integrated Library System in a Rural American Library" implementing Koha, and "Kuali OLE at the University of Chicago Library" implementing Kuali OLE.

Is your library thinking about jumping into open source software, but not sure if you have the tools in place to succeed, or where to start? You've come to the right place.

Whether you are looking to decide if open source software is right for your library or need help finding which open source software package meets your needs, this site has the content and the community to help you with those decisions.

Updated Packages

updated 28-Jul-2015
updated 16-Jul-2015
updated 3-Jul-2015
updated 1-Jul-2015
updated 30-Jun-2015

Recent Releases

released 12-Aug-2015
released 10-Aug-2015
released 3-Aug-2015
released 31-Jul-2015
Subscribe to Releases

Upcoming Events

21-Sep-2015 to 24-Sep-2015
12-Oct-2015 to 13-Oct-2015
19-Oct-2015 to 25-Oct-2015
20-Oct-2015 to 23-Oct-2015

FOSS4LIB thrives based on community-generated information! Software creators, users, and support providers are welcome to create an account on FOSS4LIB to add information about new packages, events, software releases, and support options as well as register an institution's own use of open source software.

tracker

The Conversation

I just added packages for RT and LimeSurvey, couldn't see a great category match for either. Perhaps make the content type editable, or use node reference & add a content type for Package Type?

RT and LimeSurvey are probably not good fits for FOSS4LIB. To try to keep the scope manageable (and not replicate other directories like Fresh Meat), packages in FOSS4LIB meet this definition: if it is open source, is used in libraries, and has components/plugins that are specific to libraries, then it can be included as a package in the FOSS4LIB registry. Comments about whether this scoping make sense are also welcome, but that is where we are now.

jitendersharmaji's picture

Just joined the site and looking for literature on OSS and also an easy to use OSS for making institutional repository of faculty publication

software for managing electronic library

You could include Mendeley in the Bibliography category

As far as I know Mendeley is (while free) not open source software, so it wouldn't be appropriate to include it at this site.

Am interested in Ubuntu Operating system,is there a place in South Africa where l can do training on Ubuntu for a period of two weeks. Thank you

julie's picture

Where on the site can I find a definition/description for the different categories of listed softwares, please?
For example how do you describe:
- Content Management System
- Content Management Framework
- Electronic Resources Management

as these categories share many similarities?

What are the criteria used to categorised the packages?

Thanks for your answer
Julie